Re: feeding big script to psql - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | Dan Sugalski |
---|---|
Subject | Re: feeding big script to psql |
Date | |
Msg-id | a0623090bbf151e9e67e1@[172.24.18.155] Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: feeding big script to psql (Havasvölgyi Ottó <h.otto@freemail.hu>) |
Responses |
Re: feeding big script to psql
|
List | pgsql-general |
At 1:57 PM +0200 8/2/05, Havasvölgyi Ottó wrote: >Hi, > >Now I am at 7 MB, and the reading speed is 3-4KB/sec. Have you checked to see if you're swapping as this goes on, either in the client or on the server? >----- Original Message ----- From: "Havasvölgyi Ottó" <h.otto@freemail.hu> >To: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org> >Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 1:31 PM >Subject: Re: [GENERAL] feeding big script to psql > >>Hi, >> >>The effect is the same even if I redirect the >>output to file with the -o switch. >>At the beginning 200 KB/sec, at 1.5 MB the speed is less than 20 KB/sec. >> >>Best Regards, >>Otto >> >> >> >>----- Original Message ----- From: "Havasvölgyi Ottó" <h.otto@freemail.hu> >>To: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> >>Cc: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org> >>Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 11:24 AM >>Subject: Re: [GENERAL] feeding big script to psql >> >>>Tom, >>> >>>Thanks for the suggestion. I have just applied >>>both switch , -f (I have applied this in the >>>previous case too) and -n, but it becomes slow >>>again. At the beginning it reads about 300 KB >>>a second, and when it has read 1.5 MB, it >>>reads only about 10 KB a second, it slows down >>>gradually. Maybe others should also try this >>>scenario. Can I help anything? >>> >>>Best Regards, >>>Otto >>> >>> >>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> >>>To: "Havasvölgyi Ottó" <h.otto@freemail.hu> >>>Cc: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org> >>>Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 3:54 AM >>>Subject: Re: [GENERAL] feeding big script to psql >>> >>>>=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Havasv=F6lgyi_Ott=F3?= <h.otto@freemail.hu> writes: >>>>>I know it would be faster with COPY, but this is extremly slow, and the >>>>>bottleneck is psql. >>>>>What is the problem? >>>> >>>>Hmm, does the Windows port have readline support, and if so does adding >>>>the "-n" switch to the psql invocation fix the problem? Or you could >>>>try feeding the script with -f switch or \i rather than "psql <script". >>>>Readline adds a fair amount of overhead, which is completely invisible >>>>at human typing speeds but can be annoying when reading scripts. >>>> >>>>regards, tom lane >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>>---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >>>TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate >>> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your >>> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly >>> >> >> >> >>---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >>TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? >> >> http://archives.postgresql.org >> > > > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to > choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not > match -- Dan --------------------------------------it's like this------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai dan@sidhe.org have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
pgsql-general by date: